The question of the specific cost levers of artificial intelligence is ...
With 4-6 billion daily AI queries worldwide (as of November 2025), the technology has long since outgrown the experimental phase. Nevertheless, analyses show that around 70 percent of all AI projects do not deliver the expected results. The main reason: companies do not identify the right levers for their specific context.
Based on Dreher Consulting's consulting practice, this guide shows you where the real potential lies - and how you can tap into it methodically.
Current market analyses and our project experience show: Medium-sized companies can reduce their fixed costs by 12 to 28 percent through the systematic use of AI. This range results from differences in industry, degree of digitalization maturity and chosen implementation approach.
It is crucial to understand that AI is not a monolithic solution, but a portfolio of technologies that need to be applied to specific process weaknesses. The first-principle approach - i.e. tracing complex problems back to their basic components - forms the methodological basis for identifying levers.

Our process analyses in over 120 SME projects consistently show three areas with the highest ROI potential for AI-supported optimization:
Purchasing regularly offers the fastest quick wins with high scaling potential. The levers are distributed across the following functional areas:
Traditional MRP systems (material requirements planning) often generate a flood of exception messages that have to be processed manually. AI-based demand sensing algorithms reduce this exception rate by 40-60 percent by automatically incorporating seasonal and promotional corrections and intelligently prioritizing MRP runs that can be scheduled.
The degree of automation for purchase orders (PO) and EDI processing is less than 50 percent in many companies. AI-supported touchless order processes, automatic BST generation and intelligent call-off orders can increase this figure to over 85% - with corresponding savings in personnel capacity.
AI-based supplier evaluation and automatic qualification scores enable more objective and faster supplier selection. Particularly in regulated industries such as medical technology, the automatic check in the sanctions monitor significantly accelerates compliance processes.
Intralogistics offers considerable efficiency potential through AI optimization, which has a direct impact on working capital and personnel costs:
The time from goods receipt to storage (dock-to-stock cycle time) is 12 hours or more in many companies. AI-supported ASN (Advanced Shipping Notice) processing, automatic put-away logic and rule-based random checks can reduce this value to 4 hours - DACH benchmark companies even achieve 2 hours.
Multi-order picking, mobile pick lists and pick-and-pack checks using vision AI reduce error rates and increase throughput per employee hour. The integration of stock issues during shipping in real time also minimizes stock discrepancies.
Cyclical inventory planning with AI-based tolerance limits and mobile counting significantly reduces the effort required for full counts. RFID or camera-based inventory solutions (Vision AI) can reconcile variances within 24 hours.
There are additional levers for companies with chain stores or stationary retail:
The systematic identification of the right levers follows a structured procedure that we at Dreher Consulting call the 'Atomic Intelligence' approach:
The first step is to create a complete overview of all operational processes - from determining requirements to warehousing and the point of sale. This map forms the basis for further analysis.
Each process is evaluated in terms of its suitability for automation. Criteria include data quality, process standardization, integration effort and expected business impact. The result is a colour-coded matrix (red = need for action, yellow = optimization potential, green = already optimized).
Specific target values are defined for each identified lever. Example: Reduction of the dock-to-stock cycle time from 12 to 4 hours (achievable) or 2 hours (DACH best practice). These KPIs enable objective prioritization according to ROI potential.
Implementation takes place within defined time horizons: Quick wins within 6 months, medium-term levers in 1-2 years and strategic transformations in a 5-year horizon. This staggered approach ensures an early sense of achievement while simultaneously building sustainable competitive advantages.
"70% of AI projects fail. The other 30% have correctly identified their levers."
The successful realization of the identified potential depends on several factors:
Data quality: AI models are only as good as their training data. Cleansing and standardizing master data is often a prerequisite.
Change management: Employee acceptance is the key to success or failure. Early involvement and training are essential.
ERP integration: Isolated solutions create new silos. Integration into existing ERP systems (SAP, Microsoft Dynamics, proALPHA, etc.) is crucial for scalability.
Governance and compliance: Particularly in regulated industries (medical technology, food), AI solutions must meet standards such as ISO 27001, ISO 9001 or industry-specific requirements.
In principle, companies with an annual turnover of around €20 million or more benefit. However, transaction volume and process repetition are more decisive factors than sheer size. A medium-sized wholesaler with 50,000 order items per month typically has greater potential for optimisation than a service provider with complex but infrequent transactions.
With targeted leverage selection, we see payback periods of 6 to 18 months. Quick wins in the area of automated order processing or MRP optimisation often achieve positive cash flows after just 3–4 months. More complex transformations (e.g. fully automated warehouse control) require longer investment horizons of 2–3 years.
The minimum requirements include historical transaction data covering 12–24 months, consistent master data (articles, suppliers, customers) and documented processes. In practice, many projects start with a data quality assessment that identifies and prioritises areas requiring action.
An outdated ERP system is not a deal breaker. Modern AI solutions can often be implemented as an “overlay” that communicates with the existing system via interfaces (APIs, middleware). However, it is important to consider whether parallel ERP modernisation makes more sense – especially if support is expiring or scaling limits have been reached.
For a typical pilot project, we recommend a core team consisting of a project manager (50% capacity), a department representative (30% capacity) and IT support for interface issues (20% capacity). The actual AI expertise can initially be sourced externally, but should be built up internally in the medium term.
The question "Where are the levers?" cannot be answered in general terms. It requires a systematic analysis of your own process landscape, an honest assessment of the status quo and a clear prioritization according to business impact.
The companies that carry out this analysis now will be among the 30 percent whose AI projects deliver the expected results in 2026.
The head start will not come from waiting for the 'perfect' solution, but from taking structured action with the resources available today. The innovation curve is exponential - those who start today will increase their lead over competitors who are still hesitating.
Talk directly to Dreher's AI Assistant - Click the mic icon and ask out loud or type your question. Get expert answers in seconds, available 24/7.
Ask now by voice